Talking About Tails
Penny Rankine-Parsons

After admiring a very comprehensive collection of French Bulldog bronzes
spanning the development of the breed, I was intrigued by one similarity…the
length of their tails.
These dogs had tails much longer than those we see today a fact which
prompted me to delve back into the records and find out a little more.
I one looks at the early specimens of Bulldog it is obvious that the tail
is in evidence in most pictures Toy Bulldogs were the diminutive specimens
development of the French Bulldog.
No doubt Bulldog were selected for breeding that had the shortest tails
or that their tails were docked for the following reasons:
*To avoid tax (docked dogs did not attract tax)
*To strengthen the back and increase speed
*To prevent being bitten when ratting or fighting
*To make better “sport” of bear baiting and dog fighting
It is probably then that longer tails were at one time a natural part
of the genes inherited by the Frenchie. Over time Frenchie breeders have
selected for a shorter and shorter tail. Which is in fact selecting and
perpetuating a deformity. It would be reasonable to think that a slightly
longer straighter tail may give an indication of less deformity in the
spine as a whole (a kinked or screwed tail is formed from deformed bones).
The breed standard in 1937 reads “ The tail is short, set on low
and lying flat on the buttocks, thick at the base, preferably knotted
or naturally broken and must be tapering at the ends. A straight tail
is permissible” Also in the standard (defects) it mentions “
raised or too long tail, which must not reach beyond the thigh”.
Thus giving us an indication of an acceptable length of tail. However
by 1950 the wording of the standard realting to the tail read somewhat
similar to our currant version “ Very short, set low thick at the
root and tapering quickly towards the tip and either straight or kinked
but never curling over the back. A good tail is placed so that it cannot
be carried gaily”
The addition of that small word “very” had an obvious effect
on the breed, as today it is the norm to see Frenchies with a very very
short tail, rarely covering the anus. And not uncommon to see Frenchies
with a complete absence of visible tail. Our breed standard today, describes
the tails as “ undocked, low, thick at root, tapering quickly towards
tip, either straight or kinked, never curling over back, nor carried gaily”.
To see a Frenchie with a good tail sitting snugly over its bottom covering
up the rude bits gives the finishing touch to a perfect picture.
So how short is “very short” ? and have we exaggerated the
interpretation of those two words? If we have could this be having an
undesirable effect on the heath of our Frenchies?
Anatomical considerations
An understanding of the importance of the tail and the conditions to which
a lack of tail can prdispose is gained by reviewing the anatomy and the
physiology of the normal length tail and the pelvic region. The normal
canine tail consists of approximately 20 highly mobile vertebrae largely
enclosed by very versatile muscles making the various segments, especially
the tip capable of finely graded movements. French Bulldogs have an average
of 6 or les vertebraes (often deformed) in their tails which are incapable
of fine movement.
Locomotion
The tail is important as a means of counter-balance when the dog is carrying
out complicated movements such as leaping, walking along narrow structures,
or climbing. Tail muscles are also important in stabilising the vertebral
column and supporting the action of the extensor muscles of the back as
well as those of the croup and buttocks.
Defecation and pelvic diaphragm integrity
During defecation the dog assumes a squatting position with elevation
of the tail an subsequent relaxation of muscles. The movement of the tail
during the act of defecation has a direct influence in evacuating the
faecal bolus. If the tail is removed from an inmature puppy the muscles
of the tail and pelvis may fail to develop to their full potential. Removal
of the tail in the mature dog may lead to atrophy and degeneration of
these muscles. An absence of adequate function of these muscles may result
in rectal dilatation, rectal sacculation and faecal incontinence.
Any process resulting in fascial weakening, muscle atrophy, or muscle
degeneration may predispose to this wekness in the pelvic diaphragm. Burrows
and Ellison (1989) recorded a predisposition to perineal hernia in those
brachycephalic breeds, which have naturally docked tails.
Communication and canine behaviour
The position of the tail and the way it is moved can signal pleasure,
fear, friendliness, dominance, playfulness, defensiveness. Thus a very
short tail can affect the interaction of dog with other animals and man.
Some behaviourists believe the absence of a tail may predispose a dog
to show unwarranted aggression to other dogs and man, or that they may
be the victim of attacks by other dogs due to their failure to communicate.
The tail is not merely an inconsequential appendage. It is an anatomically
and physiologically significant structure which has many biological functions
that should not he underestimated.

Sources: The French Connection. December 2003. UK
Bulldog and all about them, F. Barrett Fowler. 1925. UK
Handbook FBCofE, 1961. UK
Just Frenchies, winter 2003. USA
Vom Kuenigelberg kennel, Germany
|